Rosetta Stone: Spain or Latin America?

Rosetta Stone - Learn Spanish (Latin America) (Level 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 Set) Purchase

I bought the RosettaStone language course Espanol Totale (Level 1,2, 3, 4 & 5. I was so motivated from day one and discover immediately how to speak, write and understand. This course helps you to perfect your pronunciation with the speech-recognition technology. Shop Rosetta Stone TOTALe: Spanish (Latin America) Level 1 – 3 Set Mac|Windows at Best Buy. Find low everyday prices and buy online for delivery or in-store. Buy Rosetta Stone Spanish V4 (Latin America) S at everything you need to learn at home and on the go Rosetta Stone Spanish (Lat) Levels Develop Rosetta Stone Version 4 Filipino (Tagalog) Levels Set (PC/Mac) . 3 reviews. 5 stars. 2. 4 stars. 0. 3 stars. 0. 2 stars. 0. 1 star. 1. See all reviews.

Rosetta Stone: Spain or Latin America? I have browsed the numerous topics about Rosetta Stone but haven't found any with this specific question. But I saw that they have a Latin American and a Spain version? Has anybody tried both? If yes, which one would you recommend if my target is to master Spanish in general without binding myself to a specific country? I'm also positively surprised at the amount of links to alternative material this question has yielded. But obviously you are doing that and just want listening practice.

Much more interesting and cheaper than Rosetta Stone. I'm more likely to go to Spain on holiday, but I have several Latin American friends in my list from when they came to my country to study. So I just want to be allround: I'll be sure to check them out. I've learned the conjugations etc. There are a few idiomatic expressions "Vale" that are used in Spain but not elsewhere, and a few pronunciation differences. Go with the Spain version, and you will be understood by your visiting friends.

That is plenty immersion and practice. If your local library is like mine, they might have some Spanish learn CD's available. I recommend Pimsleur, which is one of the ones I've used in the past. Nice links here.

Thanks for posting them. All 3 seem very helpful for my listening as well as making my gymhours less boring: We are not paid by Rosetta Stone in any way, but we get to attend "Webinars" where we talk to all the people behind the scenes of Rosetta Stone.

I actually had to sign papers saying that I wouldn't talk about anything. But, what I can say, is that there are really neat things that they are planning with upgrades to the current software to make it an even more enjoyable, and efficient way to learn a foreign language.

I just finished an online session that I talked about in my previous post. It's difficult, and sometimes painful, to listen to the mistakes of the Level 1 learners I look forward to the rest of Level Cuz I've just tried a test version of Level 3 Version 3 and wasn't impressed at all. Figure 4. In the example of a Bingo game, a voice tells a story while thelearner selects words from a given chart..

The game is over when the learner creates a bingo line as shown in Figure 5. Figure 5. Sample Bingo game An example of a typing exercise is shown in figure 6; the learner is given a word or phrase, either by seeing it, hearing it, or both, and then types the text in the space provided.

Figure 6. Figure 7. Sample learner reports for teachers Personal Experience The beginning of my exploration of Spanish Latin America was confusing; I did not know what to do on each activity, but after trying for a while I caught on.

Voice recognition and pronunciation activities were problematic. I should mention here that my first language is Spanish. Does the program provide cognitive challenge and opportunities for deep processing of meaning? After reviewing the program, I consider that there to be a lack of such cognitive challenges and opportunities.

Although there are a variety of activities and levels, such activities do not require the learner to think critically or to have a deep understanding of the subject. It is important to mention that not all learners work well this way, and some may be frustrated with the learning style. It seems that providing cognitive challenges and opportunities for deep processing of meaning, does not seem to be a strong focus of the program. For instance, after listening and seeing the word or phrase learners are expected to complete diverse activities where they have to use the vocabulary learned in previous activities and lessons.

It is important to mention that such activities just fulfill the prior knowledge part. The learner is not asked or expected to use such experiences. Even if the program provided lesson plans for K teachers, these lessons would only reinforce vocabulary and grammar points without necessarily making deeper connections. Does the program promote active self-regulated collaborative inquiry?

Collaboration is fostered in Rosetta Stone through online games, activities, and practice with tutors, but the program is limited in terms of collaborative inquiry.

These activities are just intended to provide practice of the second language vocabulary and do not require students to investigate topics further, share ideas, or make appropriate use of technology. Students are not expected to share or create any product collaboratively. Does the program promote extensive engaged reading and writing across the curriculum? Certainly the promotion of engaged reading and writing across the curriculum is the weakest part of the program.

As previously shown in the screen shots, students are expected to read and write sentences, but not extensively.

Does the program help students develop strategies for effective reading, writing, and learning? The main focus of the program is listening and comprehension; reading and writing are included only incidentally. For example, students are not asked to write compositions or essays. Supplemental materials for K classrooms reinforce the language by practice and repetition, but are not related to developing such strategies in a more advanced manner. Does the program promote effective involvement and identity investment on the part of students?

Students have plenty of opportunities to interact with other students as well as with instructors online, which helps them to be enthusiastic about learning. Identity is also promoted as students participate in diverse activities. This is one of the strongest parts of the program. Although such opportunities are also promoted, they are limited to some extent.

The games are basic and one gets bored after playing the same games for a while. Conclusion All in all, Rosetta Stone Spanish Latin America is an interesting language program that has some strengths as well as weaknesses. Some of the strengths are related to providing opportunities for students to interact, practice the language, learn from others, and use previous knowledge to build on vocabulary. On the other hand, it is important to mention that Rosetta Stone does not foster critical thinking skills nor deeper connections and collaboration among learners.

Lastly, activities that develop strategies for effective reading, writing, and learning are not provided. It is important for potential users to consider how it could be adapted to better fit 21st century technologies and classrooms where deeper connections and critical thinking are promoted.

References Buckleitner, W. Retrieved April 28, from: Literacy, technology, and diversity: Teaching for success in changing times.

Cheap price Rosetta Stone - Learn Spanish (Latin America) (Level 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 Set) Purchase

Interestingly, Rosetta Stone offers Latin, its only dead language program, among much more practical languages. Until recently, Rosetta Stone only offered one level of Latin and the Latin language program was not upgraded to version 3 of the software along with all of its other language programs. At first, I erroneously assumed that the publisher might be phasing the language out due to low interest in the language, juxtaposed with more accessible and popular languages such as Spanish, French, and German. To my surprise, Rosetta Stone not only upgraded the Latin language software to version 3, it also added two more levels to the program as well. In a previous review of Latin version 2 , level 1, my only real complaint was that the software was not as comprehensive as other Rosetta Stone offerings due to its long time resistance to upgrading the software to three levels. Users of the new version 3 will be happy to know that the software has been expanded to include far more material, exercises, and options in line with other version 3 language programs.


Rosetta Stone Spanish (Latin America) Level 1-5 Set Review Summary Video

Buy Autodesk AutoCAD 2011 mac | Buy Office Word 2010


Comment It: